Learn / Track III / lesson 5 of 5
Drawdowns and position sizing
The risk number traders actually feel — how deep losses compound, how to size so you survive them, and how long recovery takes.
Definition
Track the running peak of equity, . The drawdown at time is
and the maximum drawdown is the largest over the sample. The drawdown duration is how long equity spends below a prior peak.
The asymmetry of losses
After losing a fraction , you need a gain of
to get back to even. A 10% loss needs 11%; a 25% loss needs 33%; a 50% loss needs 100%; a 90% loss needs 900%. Deep drawdowns are not just painful, they are mathematically expensive. Explore it in the drawdown calculator.
How long does recovery take?
If a strategy compounds at per year, recovering from drawdown takes about
years. At , a 30% drawdown costs roughly 2.4 years of compounding just to stand still.
Expected maximum drawdown
For a strategy with annualised Sharpe and volatility , max drawdown grows with the length of the sample, and is larger the lower the Sharpe. Simulating ten years of a 20%-vol strategy, the median maximum drawdown is about (30%) at Sharpe 1 and about (40%) at Sharpe 0.5 — and one path in four does noticeably worse. A 40% drawdown in a Sharpe-0.5 strategy is the expected outcome, not proof the strategy is broken.
Sizing per trade
The most common practical rule: risk a fixed fraction of equity on each trade, measured from entry to stop.
With 1% risk per trade, ten consecutive losers cost about 9.6% (compounded), not 10%, and you are still in the game. With 10% risk, the same streak costs 65%.
Equity 20,000, risk 1% (200), long BTC at 64,000 with a stop at 62,400. Distance is 1,600, so size is BTC, a notional of 8,000 (0.4× leverage). Use the position sizer to do this per trade.
Volatility-scaled sizing
Using ATR (average true range) as the stop distance — a stop at, say, — makes position size inversely proportional to volatility. Each trade then carries a similar amount of risk regardless of the regime. This is what many vault specs mean by “ATR position sizing”.
Judging a strategy by its backtest’s maximum drawdown and expecting the live drawdown to stay inside it. The backtest shows one path. Over a longer live period, a deeper drawdown is close to certain.